On Sun, 15 Feb 2015 02:15:43 +0100, Axel Beckert wrote: > * Which is the proper moment to move our git repository from > packages/ack-grep.git to packages/ack.git? When the source package gets renamed, IMO. > * Or do we copy it and keep the old repo until the last (then) > oldstable package with the old name is phased out? I think one repo is enough. Two would just be confusing and have no practical advantage. > * Which is the proper moment to reassign all potentially open bugs > from ack-grep to ack? (Currently a philosophical question as there > are currently no open bug reports against ack-grep. But I still > wonder about it. :-) When the new source/binary package(s) enter the archive, IMO. > * Given the questions above: Shall we rename both, binary and source > package or only the binary package? Both please. > The latter would have the advantage that we don't have to rename our > ack-grep git repository, but would clearly add confusion wrt. why > the source and binary package names are not the same. Right, I always hate it when I want to "dpt co $pkg", where $pkg in the clipboard is the binary package, and then there's no such source package and I have to go hunting for it. > Any insight? Personal preferences at least :) Cheers, gregor -- .''`. Homepage: http://info.comodo.priv.at/ - OpenPGP key 0xBB3A68018649AA06 : :' : Debian GNU/Linux user, admin, and developer - https://www.debian.org/ `. `' Member of VIBE!AT & SPI, fellow of the Free Software Foundation Europe `- NP: The Eagles: Take it easy
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital Signature