On Sun, 26 Jan 2014 00:14:15 +0100, Axel Beckert wrote: > > > libnet-irc-perl [popcon: 386] > > IIRC, this RC bug is a bit controversial -- Axel? > Yeah, I consider it a well working module with no issues in Debian at > all except that someone who claims to be upstream considers it > deprecated. (Or said otherwise: I think http://bugs.debian.org/608583 > is close to irrelevant if the package has that much popcon but no > bug-reports for years now.) I'm completely fine with lowering the severity of this bug. Any strong objections? > > > Do we want to remove the packages with popcon < N from the archive? > > > How about N=50 or 100? > > After looking at the list, N=50 sounds like a nice cutoff to me. > I agree, despite I wouldn't use that as a general threshold. It's just > nice for this particular list as there's a big gap between 92 and 38. Ack, that's how I came to this value :) Cheers, gregor -- .''`. Homepage: http://info.comodo.priv.at/ - OpenPGP key 0xBB3A68018649AA06 : :' : Debian GNU/Linux user, admin, and developer - http://www.debian.org/ `. `' Member of VIBE!AT & SPI, fellow of the Free Software Foundation Europe `- NP: Bettina Wegner: Der Prinz ist gegangen
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature