On Tue, Sep 09, 2014 at 05:13:34PM +0200, Martin Pitt wrote: > Hello again, > > Martin Pitt [2014-09-09 8:04 +0200]: > > Ah, good. I did that. I created https://titanpad.com/jQv06Sq0up to > > coordinate this, I also added the command for the testing loop that I > > use. > > I ran over 1.400 package tests on my laptop today (titanpad is up to > date), and so far the results look rather promising. There are 168 > failures (https://people.debian.org/~mpitt/tmp/perl-failures/) and 94 > packages which don't have tests (at the end of the pad), i. e. which > should be removed from the whitelist. That means that the other ~ 1150 > packages succeeded. > > If nobody else gets to it, I can run the second half of the batch > tomorrow, and then produce the final source package lists for > "passed", "failed", and "no tests", so that we can use the "passed" > one as whitelist in ci.d.n. > > I haven't looked through the logs at all. It's very likely that > there's some groups of related failures which can be fixed centrally > in pkg-perl-tools, and then surely the long tail of individual > failures. > > I suggest we start using the whitelist with the "passed" ones to avoid > showing hundreds of new failures. That is cool. FYI, I am collecting this stuff at http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/collab-maint/debian-ci-config.git so please feel free to update the whitelists there directly. When all this is ready to go live, there's where I will get the configs from. -- Antonio Terceiro <terceiro@debian.org>
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature