Hello all, gregor herrmann [2014-09-06 18:56 +0200]: > On Sat, 06 Sep 2014 12:32:34 -0300, Antonio Terceiro wrote: > > If you look at the bottom of the patch, there is some heuristics to > > detect Ruby packages based on the contents of the source directory. > > What heuristics would you use to discover perl packages? > > First idea (maybe someone from the Perl group has different ideas): > The existance of a {Makefile,Build}.PL file in the top directory of > the source package should be a good heuristics. > Maybe we also want to check for a t/ directory there (otherwise the > 'smoke' test will probably blow up?). Antonio's current patch proposal checks for both now, which makes sense. FTR, Antonio's initial proposal [1] still needs some tweaking to fix the pod.t tests, as I pointed out in [2]. That's hopefully simple to fix? We shouldn't start this with getting 3.000 known new failures :-) Thanks, Martin [1] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/autopkgtest-devel/2014-September/001067.html [2] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/autopkgtest-devel/2014-September/001071.html -- Martin Pitt | http://www.piware.de Ubuntu Developer (www.ubuntu.com) | Debian Developer (www.debian.org)
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature