[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Proposal of minimal split of libconfig-model-perl

On Tue, 09 Sep 2014 09:52:33 +0200, Dominique Dumont wrote:

> On Tuesday 09 September 2014 09:19:10 gregor herrmann wrote:
> > I'd go for Recommends for the "important" ones.
> Important for whom ? (I know, that's a trick question ;-) )

"Important" to the one who knows Config::Model best, maybe :)
> > Hm, or maybe even Depends for libconfig-model-dpkg-perl, since that's
> > what most packagers will actually need/want when they install/run cme.
> I disagree, packagers are not the only users of cme. For instance, I believe 
> that lcdproc users will not be happy to see libconfig-model-dpkg-perl 
> installed on their system (because cme is used during package upgrade).

Ok, makes sense.


 .''`.  Homepage: http://info.comodo.priv.at/ - OpenPGP key 0xBB3A68018649AA06
 : :' : Debian GNU/Linux user, admin, and developer  -  http://www.debian.org/
 `. `'  Member of VIBE!AT & SPI, fellow of the Free Software Foundation Europe
   `-   NP: Steppenwolf: Renegade

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital Signature

Reply to: