Re: Proposal of minimal split of libconfig-model-perl
On Tuesday 09 September 2014 09:19:10 gregor herrmann wrote:
> I'd go for Recommends for the "important" ones.
Important for whom ? (I know, that's a trick question ;-) )
> Hm, or maybe even Depends for libconfig-model-dpkg-perl, since that's
> what most packagers will actually need/want when they install/run cme.
I disagree, packagers are not the only users of cme. For instance, I believe
that lcdproc users will not be happy to see libconfig-model-dpkg-perl
installed on their system (because cme is used during package upgrade).
All the best
https://github.com/dod38fr/ -o- http://search.cpan.org/~ddumont/
http://ddumont.wordpress.com/ -o- irc: dod at irc.debian.org