[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#738680: RFA: libbsd-arc4random-perl -- CPAN's BSD::arc4random -- Perl bindings for arc4random



Damyan Ivanov dixit:

>> > This suggested that there's additional history that I'd like to have, 
>> > but retrieving it fails:
>> [snip]
>> > Perhaps git-cvsimport is not happy about the module rename or the 
>> > history is just not available anymore.

Oops. Sorry.

>I guess that could work, although mirroring the whole contrib/hosted 
>tree of the mirbsd's CVS seems like a nuclear approach. Thorsten, what 
>do you think? Would I get an IP ban if I try that? :)

No, you can just do that in one rsync call, and it’s not that big,
but still overkill. You can normally just download both ,v file trees
and put them together – asides from the CVSROOT/ directory, in CVS,
every file is fully self-contained, and they can be moved between
repositories or even accessed using RCS (official) or $EDITOR (not
quite official but it’s a fully-documented plaintext format).

Judging from the ,v files themselves I didn’t do a move but a copy
of the checked-out tree (possibly adjusting paths in the files as I
went) and a removal of the original tree. In this case, you can just
convert them both to git then stitch them together (BTDT, I first put
them into the same repo as different branches (in your case, all three
of them, pre-move post-move and the current git tree) then used a
.git/info/grafts file until it “looked good” in e.g. gitk, then used
a git rebase to persist the changes from the grafts file and took
care of moving the tags to the rebased sha1s).

Sorry about the trouble. If needed, I can have a look at doing such
a convert+stitch operation myself.

bye,
//mirabilos
-- 
<ch> you introduced a merge commit        │<mika> % g rebase -i HEAD^^
<mika> sorry, no idea and rebasing just fscked │<mika> Segmentation
<ch> should have cloned into a clean repo      │  fault (core dumped)
<ch> if I rebase that now, it's really ugh     │<mika:#grml> wuahhhhhh


Reply to: