On Sat, 2012-06-23 at 10:22 +0200, gregor herrmann wrote: > On Fri, 22 Jun 2012 17:22:49 -0700, Ioan Rogers wrote: > > > > Done, and some simple TODO items noted in debian/changelog. > > I just have a few questions on the TODO: > > * For the upstream copyright years, the latest release is 2011, but the > > the module itself says 2007-2009. I assume it's okay to put 2007-2011? > > Yup, that's exactly would I'd use. > > > * Is there and benefit in depending on the minimum module-build/perl > > version if those versions predate wheezy? (this would also apply to my > > using debhelper 8 rather than 9). Backports, I guess? > > Yup. > Cf. the section "Build and runtime dependencies" in > http://pkg-perl.alioth.debian.org/policy.html#debian_control_handling > where we tried to spell out this idea. Thanks. I've read so many policy docs and manuals over the last few days, I can't remember what I saw where, or even if I imagined it :-/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part