On Thu, 19 Jan 2012 16:25:26 +0100, Andreas Beckmann wrote: > > Maybe. These are modules that are in shipped both with the perl > > interpreter and in their own package (when a newer version was needed). > > We have kept them in unstable in case there was a new release, but they > > seem pretty stable. > ... > That's OK. > I'll just file a wishlist bug against perl to remove them and I don't think this is the way to go: The are released upstream in perl-core, and that's why they are and shozld be in perl(-modules) in Debian. > tag/affects/found it in a way that piuparts recognizes and moves the > failed logs for the individual packages into the "bugged" category. If they really cause a problem for piuparts (besides showing up as failed which shouldn't be a surprise to anybody :)), we can just as well ask for removal (and -- as usual -- keep the git repos in case we need them later). Cheers, gregor -- .''`. Homepage: http://info.comodo.priv.at/ - OpenPGP key 0xBB3A68018649AA06 : :' : Debian GNU/Linux user, admin, and developer - http://www.debian.org/ `. `' Member of VIBE!AT & SPI, fellow of the Free Software Foundation Europe `- NP: Rolling Stones: Moon-is-up
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature