[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: sd, libprophet-perl, and Bug#627174



>>>>> Ioan Rogers <ioan@dirtysoft.ca> writes:

[…]

 > I've updated the Github api support and am currently converting to
 > Dist::Zilla for distibution.

	If there're going to be any “user-visible” features out of the
	latter change, couldn't you please elaborate on them further (in
	the respective list)?  In particular, will this have any effect
	on the Debian packaging?

 > I was planning on sending a mail to the prophet mailing list this
 > week with further plans/ideas (other than bugfixing).  Anybody
 > interested in the non-Debian specific parts might want to look at
 > those:

 > • http://lists.bestpractical.com/mailman/listinfo/sd
 > • http://lists.bestpractical.com/mailman/listinfo/prophet

	ACK, I've now subscribed to the other one of them, and I've
	subscribed Gmane just as well [1, 2] (to be created once the
	first messages arrive in.)

	Unfortunately, the “pristine” version of the mailing list
	archives that could be uploaded to Gmane [3] is only available
	to the Mailman administrators (see, e. g., [4].)  I've sent an
	e-mail to both prophet-owner@ and sd-owner@ yesterday for an
	assistance on this, and now waiting for a reply.

[1] http://dir.gmane.org/gmane.comp.bug-tracking.sd
[2] http://dir.gmane.org/gmane.network.peer-to-peer.prophet
[3] http://gmane.org/import.php
[4] http://lists.bestpractical.com/pipermail/prophet/2011-January/000052.html

 > Back to Debian: can we get the packaging repos moved into
 > debian-perl?

	I'm still willing to assist on the packaging, BTW.  I guess that
	this package could be put under team maintenance, with one of
	us, or both, doing the bulk of the job.

-- 
FSF associate member #7257


Reply to: