[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: new package review: libunicode-stringprep-perl

On Sat, 23 Jun 2012 09:10:41 +0200, Dominique Dumont wrote:

> > The python package does not have anything special mentioned in
> > d/copyright, so I'm not sure what I should put, if anything.
> When a license statement raise questions once, it's bound to raise questions 
> later. So you should add explanations in a "Comment:" field of the copyright 
> file to avoid future discussions. Feel free to point to discussions in this 
> mailing list or to cut'n'paste whatever explanation I wrote.

I'm still not 100% sure the line of reasoning holds but we can try

In any case:
- the different copyright/license for these files have to be mentioned
  explicitly in d/copyright
- and I agree with you that a Comment: explaining what's going on
  here is highly recommended


 .''`.  Homepage: http://info.comodo.priv.at/ - OpenPGP key 0xBB3A68018649AA06
 : :' : Debian GNU/Linux user, admin, and developer  -  http://www.debian.org/
 `. `'  Member of VIBE!AT & SPI, fellow of the Free Software Foundation Europe
   `-   NP: Peter Ratzenbeck: Planxty Irwin

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: