On Wed, 06 Jun 2012 14:56:17 -0300, intrigeri wrote: > > Definitely, and it's great that you are pushing this - thanks a lot! > > (Besides the pkg-perl BoF it's also good for using it as a workplan > > during DebCamp). > I think I now have integrated all bits of clarification and feedback > to the wiki page, and reorganized things a bit. Thanks everyone > who replied! Thank you - looks really much better now :) Just one remark: The comparison with the Fedora Perl Packaging Policy already happened (well, at least I checked it) last year before we decided on the "which tests to run during package build" aspect of our group policy. I left the link just for reference but I don't think this is a current issue/topic for discussion. But I don't want to silently remove it from the Wiki page in case others want to take a look and see if it should be discussed. Cheers, gregor -- .''`. Homepage: http://info.comodo.priv.at/ - OpenPGP key 0xBB3A68018649AA06 : :' : Debian GNU/Linux user, admin, and developer - http://www.debian.org/ `. `' Member of VIBE!AT & SPI, fellow of the Free Software Foundation Europe `- NP: Kurti Ostbahn
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature