On Wed, 28 Mar 2012 12:04:33 -0400, Robert James Clay wrote: > > > Licensing requires copyright holder(s) to grant it, but being an author > > > does not automatically make you a copyright holder, as I understand it. > > ... e.g. when someone writes code as an employee during worktime, the > > copyright holder is usually the company/employer. > > (That was my assumption in this case, and we also have quite a few > > other examples for this situation.) > You and Jonas have a very good point and it's something it would > appear I need to get more familiar with. Thanks! Thanks for your careful fixes and detailed commit messages! There's on thing still open for me: You've removed the Comment from d/copyright, but you've left the author in the Copyright line. I still think that it's quite safe to assume that the copyright holder is the company in this case, therefore I'd remove his name from the Copyright field. I haven't found an explanation why you kept the name there, so I thought I just ask :) Cheers, gregor -- .''`. Homepage: http://info.comodo.priv.at/ - OpenPGP key 0xBB3A68018649AA06 : :' : Debian GNU/Linux user, admin, and developer - http://www.debian.org/ `. `' Member of VIBE!AT & SPI, fellow of the Free Software Foundation Europe `- NP: Supertramp: Give A Little Bit
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature