Re: Bug#657853: Building perl with hardened build flags
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 11:04:16PM +0000, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 06:16:16PM +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> > If it's only 30 packages we should rather push it into debhelper 9 now
> > if that's okay with Joey.
> > I'll make sure the 30 packages get rebuilt.
> I believe that debhelper 9.20120312 implements what we need.
> Niko pointed out a reliable way of finding the packages which need to
> be rebuilt at
> I guess we need an email to the buildd maintainers asking them to
> update debhelper, and then you can kick off the binNMUs and I can
> upload the few packages I have queued to bump to compat level 9.
Just wanted to check - are you happy to prod the buildd maintainers
into making sure that debhelper >= 9.20120312 is installed, or should
I? I'd like to make sure that the changes I've got queued up don't
get forgotten about.
(Is there even a way to get interrogate the buildds to get the current
set of installed packages, or a policy about how often they should
update from unstable?)
Dominic Hargreaves | http://www.larted.org.uk/~dom/
PGP key 5178E2A5 from the.earth.li (keyserver,web,email)