[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Copyright License Proposal



On 11-06-06 at 11:20am, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> I'm unaware of a hard requirement that we track upstream authors 
> (though it is certainly polite to do so);

Agreed.  It is a "should" in 
http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-docs.html#s-copyrightfile 
i.e. "only" a strong recommendation.


> but aside from the possibility of a sub-licensing scheme, debian 
> clearly needs to track the copyright holders, since it is from them 
> that debian gets a license to use, modify, and redistribute the 
> software.
> 
> Given that the upstream author is most often the same entity as the 
> copyright holder, it's not hard to see why they get conflated 
> sometimes; but if we're trying to do the Right Thing, we need to be 
> clear about which is which.

Yes.

Sorry for (my contribution to) the confusion.


 - Jonas

-- 
 * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt
 * Tlf.: +45 40843136  Website: http://dr.jones.dk/

 [x] quote me freely  [ ] ask before reusing  [ ] keep private

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: