[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Moose v2.0000 upgrade

On Thu, 14 Apr 2011 09:33:16 +0200, Dominique Dumont wrote:

(just a short note, I'm mostly offline this week)

> On Tuesday 12 April 2011 23:21:12 Alessandro Ghedini wrote:
> > What should we do? IMHO these packages should be updated to depend on 
> > libmoose-perl (fortunately some of them already do) and 

Or "libmoose-perl (>= 2) | libclass-mop-perl)"; cf. the recent
libwww-perl changes.

> > libclass-mop-perl
> > removed from the archive, meanwhile I thought I could add a Provides: 
> > libclass-mop-perl in libmoose-perl, is this correct?
> I think so. Since Class::Mop might be useful outside of Moose, I think  
> "Provides: libclass-mop-perl" should be kept indefinitely.

Please note that there are no versioned Provides, so maybe providing
libclass-mop-perl is not so helpful.

I hope that jawnsy's knowledge about the Moose world and periapt's
experiences with the libwww-perl transition can help here :) 


 .''`.   http://info.comodo.priv.at/ -- GPG key IDs: 0x8649AA06, 0x00F3CFE4
 : :' :  Debian GNU/Linux user, admin, & developer - http://www.debian.org/
 `. `'   Member of VIBE!AT & SPI, fellow of Free Software Foundation Europe
   `-    BOFH excuse #116:  the real ttys became pseudo ttys and vice-versa. 

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: