Re: libcgi-psgi-perl and libhtml-mason-psgihandler-perl
On Mon, Jan 03, 2011 at 07:17:29PM +0000, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 02, 2011 at 12:10:40AM +0100, gregor herrmann wrote:
> > On Sat, 01 Jan 2011 12:12:42 -0800, Ivan Kohler wrote:
> > > > libcgi-psgi-perl and libhtml-mason-psgihandler-perl look a bit weird
> > > > on http://pkg-perl.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/pet.cgi ; is it possible
> > > > that you've uploaded them but haven't committed the last changes (and
> > > > haven't tagged the package) in svn?
> > > It doesn't look like I uploaded them (I see no .upload files in my
> > > build-area), but I'm sure I could have messed up something, I'm years
> > > late to the pkg-perl party. It doesn't look like I have any uncommited
> > > changes either? ("svn diff" shows none)
> > Oh ...
> > > There's packages in the NEW queue from Dominic Hargreaves, perhaps
> > > that's what's causing the packages to show up oddly in PET?
> > ... that explains!
> > Sorry for not having checked, it didn't come to my mind that person A
> > works in svn und person B uploads the same packages from somewhere
> > else :)
> > > Looks like
> > > I neglected to file an ITP when I checked things into svn; my apologies.
> > No harm done so far.
> > For the future the two of you maybe should decide how/where/... these
> > packages are maintained (and then either svn could be updated to the
> > "real" packages or the "fake" packages removed from there).
> I wasn't planning to maintain the packages as part of the Perl team;
> the repos for the packages in NEW are:
> but if you want them as Perl team packages I won't object to uploads
> superceding them being done.
For the record, I haven't had a response to this, so I'm going to
continue with the assumption that these packages won't be team
maintained for now. The packages in SVN should probably be removed.
Dominic Hargreaves | http://www.larted.org.uk/~dom/
PGP key 5178E2A5 from the.earth.li (keyserver,web,email)