On 10:52 Fri 22 Oct , Jonathan Yu wrote: > In fairness, I think it's fairer to compare lintian warnings vs total > number of packages, e.g. the average lintian warnings per package. > > We have approximately the same absolute number bugs & lintian warnings > as the non-pkg-perl Perl packages, but also a much larger number of > packages (by a factor of 4!) Right, that's very nice. > > | Nb packages | 1647 | 423 | 2070 | > > | Popcon | 2351459 | 985359 | 3336818 | > > | Open bugs | 1123 | 1260 | 2383 | > > | Archived bugs | 10777 | 8617 | 19394 | > > | Lintian warnings | 3433 | 3395 | 6828 | > > So I think we're doing pretty well, congratulations everyone & keep up > the good work! We seem to also resolve more bugs than non-group > maintained packages. And remember that perl packages were in debian at first without any existing perl team. So Archived bugs are quite huge from both part. But lot of work have been done before the perl team creation. > All in all, I think this is a very good argument for group maintainership, > especially since our collective popcon is so high -- we're clearly taking care > of some very key modules, and that's a great thing. +1 > Thanks for these awesome stats Xavier! Np. Greetings, -- Xavier Oswald <xoswald@debian.org> GNU/Linux Debian Developer - http://www.debian.org/ GPG key ID: 0x464B8DE3
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature