Re: Perl 5.12 status update
On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 07:23:33PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Our proposal would therefore be that we look again at the number and
> severity of outstanding issues related to moving to Perl 5.12 once the
> Python transition has finished and evaluate at that point whether it
> would be feasible to do so before freezing.
>
All,
Unfortunately, it seems that we haven't been able to fit this transition
in for the squeeze release, so it looks like perl 5.12 will have to be
targetted at squeeze+1.
Apologies,
Neil
--
A. Because it breaks the logical sequence of discussion
Q. Why is top posting bad?
gpg key - http://www.halon.org.uk/pubkey.txt ; the.earth.li A40F862E
Reply to: