On Wed, 16 Jun 2010 16:55:48 +0200, Martín Ferrari wrote: > > The simplest solution would therefore be to finally upload the > > remaining packages; ... which I've done in the meantime. (Sorry, no examples for the time being) > > of course additionally an improvement in PET > > wouldn't hurt :) > I'm surprised by this. PET should detect a directory/source name > mismatch, but still be able to track by source name, IIRC... Yup, but this is a different situation: it's about renamed source packages where also the directory is renamed, so there's no mismatch warning. The unfortunate side-effect is that PET doesn't have any information about the state of the package in the archive (which is no surprise -- svn has has source package = directory = libFOO-BAR-perl, the archive still has FOO-BAR). Hm, maybe looking if there is a binary package with the same name in the archive would help? > I guess > I'll have to dive into de code (and have a surge of must-clean-this > feeling :)) Yeah :) Cheers, gregor -- .''`. http://info.comodo.priv.at/ -- GPG key IDs: 0x8649AA06, 0x00F3CFE4 : :' : Debian GNU/Linux user, admin, & developer - http://www.debian.org/ `. `' Member of VIBE!AT & SPI, fellow of Free Software Foundation Europe `- NP: Dandy Warhols: Holiday
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature