-=| Alessandro Ghedini, Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 03:22:08PM +0100 |=-
> On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 02:24:47PM +0100, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> > Unfortunately so far, e.g. PET [1] does not work with our modules
> > maintained in git-repositories.
>
> Does this mean that git is kind of "deprecated" for pkg-perl packages?
Hm, no. Git is not yet plugged in the "original", "common" workflow.
What I think this means is:
(a) PET can't be used to track the status of the package
this is not the end of the world, but you'd have to use some
other way to do so. PET has been proved indispensable for
maintaining great piles of packages.
(b) There is no documentation. Compare with
http://pkg-perl.alioth.debian.org/subversion.html
(SIGH, I should really do something similar for Git).
(c) because of (a), you'll have to look for sponsors by mailing (to
this ML) or on IRC (#debian-perl on irc.debian.org, a.k.a. OFTC)
You'll have to weight out the full workflow integration with the
discomfort of working with Subversion :-/
And, if the discomfort is big, and you have the time and the energy to
fix (a) and (b), that would be really awesome!
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature