On Mon, 31 May 2010 07:37:37 -1000, Joel Roth wrote: > This is an app, and installs nama, and executable. > Ansgar suggested on the channel that the package should > have a simple name (i.e. nama) instead of the usual > libfoo-bar-perl. > I recall discussions with Gregoa and others, mostly > advocating the latter. Hm, did I say that? Possible, at least I vaguely remember discussing advantages and disadvantages of both options and of putting it in svn/trunk and svn/apps and git :) > I observe that Padre, another end-user application, has a > debian package 'padre', while its optional plugins and > libraries are libpadre-*. > Naturally I would prefer that naming as well. Ack, if it's an app and no module 'nama' sounds more logical. Cheers, gregor -- .''`. http://info.comodo.priv.at/ -- GPG key IDs: 0x8649AA06, 0x00F3CFE4 : :' : Debian GNU/Linux user, admin, & developer - http://www.debian.org/ `. `' Member of VIBE!AT & SPI, fellow of Free Software Foundation Europe `- NP: Various Artists: Heitor Villa Lobos Choros No 1
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature