Application naming (was: Re: gen-itp)
- To: debian-perl@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Application naming (was: Re: gen-itp)
- From: Joel Roth <joelz@pobox.com>
- Date: Mon, 31 May 2010 07:37:37 -1000
- Message-id: <20100531173737.GA14321@sprite>
- Reply-to: Joel Roth <joelz@pobox.com>
- In-reply-to: <20100531060146.GA9960@sprite>
- References: <20100531060146.GA9960@sprite>
On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 08:01:46PM -1000, Joel Roth wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm ramping up to debianize my distribution Audio::Nama.
> Trying to recall what I learned (but mostly didn't
> write down) from my last packaging exercise.
This is an app, and installs nama, and executable.
Ansgar suggested on the channel that the package should
have a simple name (i.e. nama) instead of the usual
libfoo-bar-perl.
I recall discussions with Gregoa and others, mostly
advocating the latter.
I observe that Padre, another end-user application, has a
debian package 'padre', while its optional plugins and
libraries are libpadre-*.
Naturally I would prefer that naming as well.
--
Joel Roth
Reply to:
- References:
- gen-itp
- From: Joel Roth <joelz@pobox.com>