-=| Jonathan Yu, Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 01:53:37PM -0500 |=- > On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 1:24 PM, Maximilian Gass <mxey@ghosthacking.net> wrote: > > This module is no longer on CPAN, the upstream site is gone, its popcount is > > only 30 and it has no reverse dependencies. > > > > Should we keep it? > > No. I vote we file an RM against it -- having no reverse dependencies > and being unmaintained upstream is sufficient for me. I don't think we > should be keeping unmaintained or poorly maintained software in > Debian. Keeping would mean we take over upstream. Although possible, this would be unusual. RM++ -- dam
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature