On Wed, Oct 07, 2009 at 12:13:45PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Wed, Oct 07, 2009 at 05:19:10PM +0200, Dominique Dumont wrote:> Also, I haven't looked into either one in enough detail, but how does > your approach differ from ucf?ucf has a rather crude upgrade strategy: either accept upstream or keep your file or use your favorite editor.That's not true. ucf supports three-way merges.
Correct.A big difference is that ucf does line-based merges whereas Config::Model does object-based merges: It is taught semantics of the config file so can distinguish config "items" apart.
- Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature