On Sat, 20 Dec 2008 18:45:30 +0100, Dominique Dumont wrote: > Here we go: Thanks! > > - /usr/bin/config-edit sounds like a very generic name; is it > > needed (under /usr/bin/)? should it be renamed? > config-edit is indeed a very generic name. That's because > Config::Model is also a generic framework. As a framework, > Config::Model is able to edit any kind of (well, most of) > configuration file provided (here's the rub) that a model is > available. Ok, I see. > So far, the only model worth talking about are the sshd_config and > ssh_config model [2] . With these model, users will be able to edit > /etc/ssh/sshd_config with the following command: If config-edit's purpose is to edit files that are only writable by root it should probably to go /usr/sbin. But if it's for all kind of config files (also under $HOME) then /usr/bin is fine ... > > - Build.PL talks about Term::ReadLine::Perl or Term::ReadLine::Gnu; should > > they be in Suggests? > Yes. You're right. Ok. > I have another question, config-edit is much easier to use with the > Gui (or the Curses interface). I still need to package these modules > for Debian. Is it acceptable to "Recommend" package which are not yet > available ? Or should I wait for them to be available before adding > them in the Recommends list of libconfig-model-perl ? Please wait with the Recommends until the packages are available: * apt (since a few months) installs Recommends by default. * "No unmet recommends relations inside main" is a lenny release goal (and of course also valid for after-lenny): http://release.debian.org/lenny/goals.txt Cheers, gregor -- .''`. Home: http://info.comodo.priv.at/{,blog/} / GPG Key ID: 0x00F3CFE4 : :' : Debian GNU/Linux user, admin, & developer - http://www.debian.org/ `. `' Member of VIBE!AT, SPI Inc., fellow of FSFE | http://got.to/quote/ `- NP: Johnny Cash: The Man Comes Around
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature