-=| Jeremiah Foster, Tue, Dec 09, 2008 at 08:35:33AM +0100 |=- > On Dec 9, 2008, at 7:13 AM, Damyan Ivanov wrote: >> debian-perl, do you mind if I use a Git repository under >> git.debian.org/git/pkg-perl/apps for it? > > Interesting to see what you think about maintaining packages with git > dam. I know there has been talk about it on the list previously, but it > looks like you are building up some experience. I think all the best about using Git for packaging. The problem I have with it (and this is the reason why I don't push it harder for pkg-perl) is that the analog to "svn up" for a thousand of Git repositories is way too slow. This is also the reason why I use Git in quiet corner of pkg-perl -- apps/, destined to packaging of applications, which is a new (and still experimental) stream of packages to the group. > Are there I guess you mean "... Git-maintained packages in the group?". padre[1] and clive[2]. I have set up a git-svn mirror[3] for dh-make-perl, in order to make it a bit easier for Git-preferring Perl gurus to contribute patches. Uh, well, I also use git-svn for dh-make-perl hacking and I am very pleased with it. [1] http://git.debian.org/?p=pkg-perl/apps/padre.git [2] http://git.debian.org/?p=pkg-perl/apps/clive.git [3] http://git.debian.org/?p=pkg-perl/apps/dh-make-perl.git Ah, there is another showstopper before wider addoption of Git in the group: PET does not support it. I think Tincho expects patches from me for this, but I am not there yet (and won't be any time soon). -- dam JabberID: dam@jabber.minus273.org
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature