On Thu, 19 Jun 2008 21:05:00 +0200, Franck Joncourt wrote: > > If you don't have > > trunk checked out (which is quite big, mine is 1.1G, 868 packages), I > > guess you should not use the script and inject as usual, or patch it > > to support such scenario :) > As I do not have a lot of packages, I create a directory for each of > them and clean it when I do not work on them. That's how I started, too, ... > 868 packages, this is quite huge :) but now I'm quite used to the whole trunk :) > > The debian/dir in upstream source could really be annoying. If it > > causes any trouble, repackage (and file a bug upstream). > I have sent an email to Bernd Eckenfels and the upstream author (Francis > J. Lacoste) to know about the package on the CPAN website : [..] > If not, as you said, I will fill a bug for the CPAN module. I'd do that in any case. The whole debian/ dir is in a rather not-really-fresh state, so probably just repacking [0] the tarball (and removing the dir) might be an idea in a short term view [1]. Cheers, gregor [0] There's a nice repack.sh example in scripts/ in our svn repository. [1] Or even in a long term view -- the last upstream release is from September 1999 -- .''`. http://info.comodo.priv.at/ | gpg key ID: 0x00F3CFE4 : :' : debian gnu/linux user, admin & developer - http://www.debian.org/ `. `' member of https://www.vibe.at/ | how to reply: http://got.to/quote/ `- NP: Red Hot Chili Peppers: Hey
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature