Gunnar Wolf wrote: > Julian Mehnle dijo [Fri, Sep 21, 2007 at 01:15:36PM +0000]: > > if you have 5 minutes of spare time, please read > > > > http://julian.io.link-m.de/misc/%23debian-perl_source-package-naming.txt > > > > and give your opinions on whether, and under which circumstances, > > _source_ packages of Perl modules in Debian should be required to be > > named /^lib.*-perl$/. (This is not about binary package names, which > > should be named so without a doubt.) Thanks! > > [...] > And yes, I am all for moving mime-lite and similar abnormalities into > the regular scheme. They are just exceptions. Three packages (out of > over 1000 Perl modules currently in Debian) were mentioned - If they > are not depended on all over the place, moving to a saner way will be > in the interest of everybody. Even if they are quite popular as > dependencies, of course, we can provide the older name. Dependencies do not relate to source package names, which is all I was talking about. Julian.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.