On Fri, 21 Dec 2007 20:04:43 -0600, Gunnar Wolf wrote: > > (v?\d[\d_.]+)\.(?:tar(?:\.gz|\.bz2)?|tgz|zip|rar) > umh... Sounds saner (I was about to suggest changing [[:digit:]].* to > [\d_.]+ - I'm a bit unsure about requiring the first \d, would .01 > be a valid version? Or on requiring the version number to be two > characters wide - 1 is a valid version as well...) Do single-digit versions really exist? Two things I noticed today * There are modules with letters in the version string (0.42a and the like) * We have at least one module with a dash in the upstream version > About the list of supported schemes, I'd just drop rar, as it is a > very seldom used format, which requires a nonfree extractor most of > the time. The free unrar supports only ancient versions AFAIK. Sounds reasonable. > And... Well, why are you using search.cpan.org instead of > www.cpan.org/modules/by-module/Module-Name ? It works, of course, but > it's easier just to copy the string over to wget ;-) search.cpan.org is much faster -- I'm sure Damyan can present his research results :) Thanks for your comments! Cheers, gregor -- .''`. http://info.comodo.priv.at/ | gpg key ID: 0x00F3CFE4 : :' : debian: the universal operating system - http://www.debian.org/ `. `' member of https://www.vibe.at/ | how to reply: http://got.to/quote/ `- NP: Bruce Springsteen: Valentine's Day
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature