Re: libmediawiki-perl
On 8/19/07, Michael Mende <debian@menole.net> wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 18, 2007 at 09:42:27PM +0200, Carl F??rstenberg wrote:
> > 2007-07-08 I opened a RFP for libmediawiki-perl, and Michael Mende
> > some days later marked it as ITP, so long so good. But I have not seen
> > any progress of this package, so I tried to mail MM, but probably by
> > some missconfigured mail thingi, the mail could not get to him.
> There is no misconfigured mail thing on our side but a greylist daemon
> which blocks first attempts from dynamic IP addresses :)
>
> >
> > Michael, if you are reading this, are you still in progress of
> > packaging libmediawiki-perl, or could we start packaging it?
> So urgent? Please feel free to take it over.
>
> > Hash::Case, Hash::WithDefaults and Config::IniHash are allready in the
> > SVN, so you don't need to care about those.
> > --
> > /Carl F??rstenberg <azatoth@gmail.com>
>
> --
> Kind Regards,
> Michael Mende
>
> http://www.menole.net/
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
>
> iD8DBQFGyAU1sbQBx4LvbcERAjg9AKCq7x8qqjaDiryToGlJko+/IwwhsgCgwpB8
> IBnceTu1R6yvZNEprMhbRS0=
> =wPdC
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>
Doesn't look like a greylist to me:
This is the mail system at host smtpout.hostsharing.net.
I'm sorry to have to inform you that your message could not
be delivered to one or more recipients. It's attached below.
For further assistance, please send mail to postmaster.
If you do so, please include this problem report. You can
delete your own text from the attached returned message.
The mail system
<menole@gmx.de>: host mx0.gmx.de[213.165.64.100] said: 550-5.1.1 {mx097}
- Show quoted text -
<menole@gmx.de>... Sorry, your envelope sender has been denied: The
recipient 550 5.1.1 does not want to receive mail from your address. (
http://portal.gmx.net/serverrules ) (in reply to RCPT TO command)
Final-Recipient: rfc822; menole@gmx.de
Original-Recipient: rfc822;menole@gmx.de
Action: failed
Status: 5.1.1
Remote-MTA: dns; mx0.gmx.de
Diagnostic-Code: smtp; 550-5.1.1 {mx097} <menole@gmx.de>... Sorry, your
envelope sender has been denied: The recipient 550 5.1.1 does not want to
receive mail from your address. ( http://portal.gmx.net/serverrules )
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "Carl Fürstenberg" <azatoth@gmail.com>
To: "Michael Mende" <debian@menole.net>
Date: Sun, 19 Aug 2007 11:08:06 +0200
Subject: Re: libmediawiki-perl
On 8/19/07, Michael Mende <debian@menole.net> wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 18, 2007 at 09:42:27PM +0200, Carl F??rstenberg wrote:
> > 2007-07-08 I opened a RFP for libmediawiki-perl, and Michael Mende
> > some days later marked it as ITP, so long so good. But I have not seen
> > any progress of this package, so I tried to mail MM, but probably by
> > some missconfigured mail thingi, the mail could not get to him.
> There is no misconfigured mail thing on our side but a greylist daemon
> which blocks first attempts from dynamic IP addresses :)
doesn't look like a greylist for me:
This is the mail system at host smtpout.hostsharing.net.
I'm sorry to have to inform you that your message could not
be delivered to one or more recipients. It's attached below.
For further assistance, please send mail to postmaster.
If you do so, please include this problem report. You can
delete your own text from the attached returned message.
The mail system
<menole@gmx.de>: host mx0.gmx.de[213.165.64.100] said: 550-5.1.1 {mx022}
<menole@gmx.de>... Sorry, your envelope sender has been denied: The
recipient 550 5.1.1 does not want to receive mail from your address. (
http://portal.gmx.net/serverrules ) (in reply to RCPT TO command)
Final-Recipient: rfc822; menole@gmx.de
Original-Recipient: rfc822;menole@gmx.de
Action: failed
Status: 5.1.1
Remote-MTA: dns; mx0.gmx.de
Diagnostic-Code: smtp; 550-5.1.1 {mx022} <menole@gmx.de>... Sorry, your
envelope sender has been denied: The recipient 550 5.1.1 does not want to
receive mail from your address. ( http://portal.gmx.net/serverrules )
--
/Carl Fürstenberg <azatoth@gmail.com>
--
/Carl Fürstenberg <azatoth@gmail.com>
Reply to: