Re: Subversion repository layout
gregor herrmann <gregor+debian@comodo.priv.at> writes:
> For those of you who haven't seen it yet: Joey has some interesting
> comments on the Debian Perl Group's svn repository layout in his blog
> at
> http://kitenet.net/~joey/blog/entry/on_storing_Debian_packages_in_subversion/
> IMO his idea to use "{trunk,tags,branches}/$package" instead of our
> current "$package/{trunk,tags,branches}" looks quite interesting. At the
> moment I have all (and only the) trunks checked out individually which
> is not ideal. Just getting "trunk/" seems easier to me (although I'd
> have to change some scripts and find out how svn-buildpackage and
> friends work with this layout :-)).
> And Joey's offer to do the reorganization of the repo sounds attractive,
> too ;-)
It sounds great to me provided that the svn-buildpackage support for the
other layout is now all there. There are still warnings in the man pages
about it not being supported, but I have a sneaking suspicion that the man
pages are just out of date?
--
Russ Allbery (rra@debian.org) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>
Reply to: