Hello Matthias Klose recently wrote about an issue with "long *double" changes in GCC that maybe makes it necessary to rename some Perl packages. He proposed that my below quoted questions should be discussed among the Perl core maintainers: > > On 2007-06-23 Matthias Klose wrote: > > > Package: libdbi-perl > > ... > > > This package has been indentified as one with header files in > > > /usr/include matching 'long *double'. Please close this bug report > > > if it is a false positive, or rename the package accordingly. > > > > The libdbi-perl package has no files in /usr/include. The long double > > is only in a header file that is hidden deep in /usr/lib/perl5. > > > > Does it make sense to link against /usr/lib/perl5/auto/DBI/DBI.so? > > > > Do I really have to rename the pacakge? And if so to libdbi-perl-ldbl or > > to libdbi-perlldbl? What do you think? bye, -christian-
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature