Re: Maintainer field
* gregor herrmann (firstname.lastname@example.org) :
> > I'm perfectly OK with the idea of letting the team hold the
> > Maintainer place for these packages.
> Cool, I've committed these changes, too.
> (BTW: Why is liblogger-syslog-perl 1.1-1 not yet uploaded?)
> > I did upload the packages a couple of months ago, but they didn't
> > pass the NEW queue because of the name of libxml-libxml-xpath.
> > After a discussion with the FTP masters, we went through an
> > agreement. I was then in a lack of free time, on the freeze came.
> > I was also told that libxml-libxml-xpath will be (when ?) included
> > in libxml-perl. I don't know the current status of that.
> Alright, I guess we can leave the status quo until someone finds out
> anything new.
> > Moreover, I was needing those libraries for backup-manager, but in
> > the next upstream release of backup-manager, the Amazon S3 support
> > will be completely rewritten, and I won't need
> > libnet-amazon-s3-perl anymore.
> > As far as I know I'm the only maintainer that needs that Perl
> > module for satisfying a package dependency.
> Do you still plan to upload libnet-amazon-s3-perl or do you think
> it's generally useless?
No, I plan to drop it from our SVN repo, the next version of
backup-manager won't need it anymore, so it's not worth bothering.
Alexis Sukrieh <email@example.com>
Backup Manager http://www.backup-manager.org