Re: Debian Perl Group upload: libnet-patricia-perl

[Daniel Ruoso <daniel@ruoso.com>]

But Patricia.pm is arch-independent, right? I agree that Patricia.so is
arch-dependent... Isn't it the case of putting .bs and .so in usr/lib
and .pm in usr/share?

Em Seg, 2004-01-26 às 12:24, Colin Watson escreveu:
> On Mon, Jan 26, 2004 at 11:04:18AM -0300, Daniel Ruoso wrote:
> > lintian almost ok:
> > W: libnet-patricia-perl:
> > package-installs-nonbinary-perl-in-usr-lib-perl5
> > usr/lib/perl5/Net/Patricia.pm
> > 
> > <QUOTE
> > FROM="http://lintian.debian.org/reports/Tpackage-installs-nonbinary-perl-in-usr-lib-perl5.html";>
> > Architecture-independent Perl code should be placed in /usr/share/perl5,
> > not /usr/lib/perl5.
> > </QUOTE>
> 
> lintian's wrong; Patricia.pm is a thin wrapper around Patricia.so (from
> XS), which *is* architecture-dependent. Brendan O'Dea explained this
> some time ago on this list, but the lintian maintainer has refused to
> change it even though having files in /usr/lib rather than /usr/share is
> safe while having files in /usr/share rather than /usr/lib can break
> things.
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> -- 
> Colin Watson                                  [cjwatson@flatline.org.uk]