Re: Apache and perl-5.6

To: "Brian E. Ermovick" <talon@midkemia.yi.org>
Cc: debian-perl@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Apache and perl-5.6
From: "Darren/Torin/Who Ever..." <torin@daft.com>
Date: 30 Nov 2000 02:29:09 -0800
Message-id: <[🔎] 87sno992iy.fsf@perv.daft.com>
In-reply-to: "Darren/Torin/Who Ever..."'s message of "29 Nov 2000 05:13:04 -0800"
References: <[🔎] 20001129013707.A28327@midkemia.yi.org> <[🔎] 871yvuaplr.fsf@perv.daft.com>

I said:
>Yep.  Should I put a warning in the preinst stating that this will make
>Perl 5.6 the definitive Debian Perl.  This shouldn't break things even
>if /usr/bin/perl == Perl 5.005 but things do happen.  Abort? (y/N)

So, that no one commented, does that mean that the answer is no? that
no one cares enough (effectively no..)  or what?

Darren
-- 
<torin@daft.com><http://www.daft.com/~torin/> <torin@debian.org><perl@slut.org>
Darren Stalder/2608 Second Ave, @282/Seattle, WA 98121-1212/USA/+1-206-ELF-LIPZ
@		     Make a little hot-tub in your soul.		      @

Reply to:

References:
- Apache and perl-5.6
  - From: "Brian E. Ermovick" <talon@midkemia.yi.org>
- Re: Apache and perl-5.6
  - From: "Darren/Torin/Who Ever..." <torin@daft.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Apache and perl-5.6
Previous by thread: Re: Apache and perl-5.6
Next by thread: Re: Apache and perl-5.6
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread