Bug#802660: RFP: Libreoffice (calc) -- libreoffice, calc
Hi,
please always keep the bug in Cc otherwise discussions don't get recorded.
In this case, the package list you posted would be helpful to actually
appear in the bug..
On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 01:10:48PM +0200, Dr. Ernst-Dieter Klinkenberg wrote:
> Hallo and a question, do you speak german? (would be easyer for me to be more
> detailed)
I do, but this is unfortunately not relevant for here, bug report language
is english.
You can tell me stuff in German but I then need to rephrase it for this bug
report...
> This is my first debian bug report and I use the tool "reportbug-ng"
Against what package?
> > I have honestly no idea why one can get the idea to file this against wnpp
> > and file a Request for package if one can report it against
> > libreoffice-calc (or, if one doesnÄt know that package itself to
> > libreoffice).. Reassigning :)
>
> see above (btw. what is wnpp?)
bugs.debian.org/wnpp. wnpp.debian.org
You filed a "Request for package"...
> did not know ... and do not know how to report "correctly"
Well, even in other disros you need to fgile it agianst the correct component
or package ;).
> I feel it is quite difficult to report errors "correctly"
> The reporting tool came up at the end with the email I sended
No. You just need to choose "libreoffice" as what you report against.
But anyway, let's get to the point
> ii libreoffice 1:5.0.3~rc1-2 amd64 office
> productivity suite (metapackage)
> ii libreoffice-avmedia-back 1:5.0.3~rc1-2 amd64 GStreamer
> backend for LibreOffice
> ii libreoffice-base 1:5.0.3~rc1-2 amd64 office
> productivity suite -- database
> ii libreoffice-base-core 1:5.0.3~rc1-2 amd64 office
> productivity suite -- shared library
> ii libreoffice-base-drivers 1:5.0.3~rc1-2 amd64 Database
> connectivity drivers for LibreOffice
> ii libreoffice-calc 1:5.0.3~rc1-2 amd64 office
> productivity suite -- spreadsheet
> ii libreoffice-common 1:5.0.3~rc1-1 all office
> productivity suite -- arch-independent files
> ii libreoffice-core 1:5.0.3~rc1-2 amd64 office
> productivity suite -- arch-dependent files
> ii libreoffice-draw 1:5.0.3~rc1-2 amd64 office
> productivity suite -- drawing
> ii libreoffice-impress 1:5.0.3~rc1-2 amd64 office
> productivity suite -- presentation
> ii libreoffice-java-common 1:5.0.3~rc1-1 all office
> productivity suite -- arch-independent Java su
> ii libreoffice-kde 1:5.0.3~rc1-2 amd64 office
> productivity suite -- KDE integration
> ii libreoffice-math 1:5.0.3~rc1-2 amd64 office
> productivity suite -- equation editor
> ii libreoffice-pdfimport 1:5.0.3~rc1-2 amd64 PDF Import
> component for LibreOffice
> ii libreoffice-report-build 1:5.0.3~rc1-2 amd64 LibreOffice
> component for building database reports -
> ii libreoffice-style-galaxy 1:5.0.3~rc1-1 all office
> productivity suite -- Galaxy (Default) symbol
> ii libreoffice-style-tango 1:5.0.3~rc1-1 all office
> productivity suite -- Tango symbol style
> ii libreoffice-writer 1:5.0.3~rc1-2 amd64 office
> productivity suite -- word processor
Nothing else? No libreoffice-l10n or so? As you above talked about feeling
better with german I'd assume you installed the german language package, too?
What happens if you upgrade the things you still have at 1:5.0.3~rc1-1 to their
current version? This shouldn't affect anything as the change between -1 and -2
didn't affect real package contents, but...
How did you upgrade in the first place?
> First I thougt this a LO error and squeezed the LO people but they pointed me
> to a correctly working experimental built 5.02-2
There's no "experimental build 5.02-2". But yes, I'd assume that it
will work also at home when I am going to try this..
Regards,
Rene
Reply to: