Bug#516090: Additional information
Hi,
Julien Blanc wrote:
> In fact, i'm saying wrong version, because i would expect apt-get not to
> install anything in this case (not migrating to 3.0 since there is a
> dependancy breakage). This is what it does when installing, unfortunately not
There is no dependency breakage. The dependencies allow to make your situation happen, yes,
so that's a bug in the dependencies, but the apt just sees the specified dependencies and
the "solution" it found is "correct" given the dependencies (though not giving a working
app of course).
> I'm new to debian bug submitting, so i won't argue about ranking, although i
> thought that running an upgrade and then having a broken app, might be
> considered as "grave" (for information, i can confirm this behaviour on
No, it's improper dependencies. Read what the bts says about this.
> another machine running sid, i386).
Of course. Simply because the i386 binaries do not exist yet. *Of course* the
same problem will happen on anything which doesn't have 3.0.1 binaries in sid yet.
Grüße/Regards,
René
--
.''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer
: :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/
`. `' rene@debian.org | GnuPG-Key ID: 248AEB73
`- Fingerprint: 41FA F208 28D4 7CA5 19BB 7AD9 F859 90B0 248A EB73
Reply to: