[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#513743: clone/reassign to gcc



reassign 514830 openoffice.org
thanks

no, this is likely a bug in OOo. before re-assigning this again:

 - please find out if it is fixed in 3.0.x (apparently it is)
 - please find out if it is fixed in 2.4.2 (apparently you are not
   interested in it).
 - please find out which object file in the libcomphelp4gcc3.so
   does cause the issue (apparently you are not interested in it).

For me it looks like a latent bug which is uncovered with GCC-4.3.3, and which
is fixed in OOo-3.0.x. FYI with the recent upgrade we found bad code in debtags
in libgsf, none in code generation. Just because OOo is big, and you don't care
about finding the root of the problem is no reason to reassign the report. So
please name the object file which causes this problem. If you don't have the
time to do so it may help to document how this library is built and how you mix
the object files from two different builds, so that others are able to
investigate the problem.

  Matthias

Rene Engelhard schrieb:
> clone 513743 -1
> reassign -1 gcc-4.3
> reopen -1
> # maybe before, but that's the first version which appears in a buildog
> # of a build causing a broken version
> found -1 4.3.2-4
> thanks
> 
> Hi,
> 
> ok, OOo is now fixed in testing by a bin-NMU with testings gcc (and that's
> what will be in lenny), but it still is a gcc bug which *might* have effect
> on other stuff too - so I am reassigning a clone to gcc itself and repening
> that clone.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Rene
> 
> 




Reply to: