[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#383312: Please package OpenOffice.org DTDs independently



[ please keep the bug in the Cc ]

Hi,

Am Mittwoch, 16. August 2006 16:17 schrieben Sie:
> > That's also why I didn't do #321876.. Well, we probably could do a openoffice.org1-dtds,
> > but I doubt its sense ;-)
> 
> As a matter of fact I ran into the following problem:
> 
> I write/translate/... books in a custom ultra-light XML format which I
> transform into OOo 1 XML with XSLT scripts so my editor can check set /
> have them typeset / ...
> 
> I wanted to show off about this to a friend who had an AMD 64 and my
> program would not run because it couldn't check the produced XML file
> against the officiel OOo DTD (of course, I could have deactivated that
> check).

Yes, but the point is, whatever you checked against was *not* the official OOo2 DTD.
It's the 1.1.x file format. Not OD.

And would you like a openoffice.org1-dtds (note the 1!) package. I don't really...

> He told me it was still difficult to install OOo on his architecture. So

well, openoffice.org, yes. But not openoffice.org-common :)

> I told him we don't need the full OOo stuff, just the DTDs... and
> discovered it was not (easily) available for him.

It still isn't, either. Unless you really want to validate against the 1.1.x format.

> > I'll look whether I can add the OD DTD...

Doesn't look that easy..
I'll ask upstream..

Regards,

Rene
-- 
 .''`.  René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer
 : :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/
 `. `'  rene@debian.org | GnuPG-Key ID: 248AEB73
   `-   Fingerprint: 41FA F208 28D4 7CA5 19BB  7AD9 F859 90B0 248A EB73



Reply to: