Re: Doing away with stlport for OOo 2.0
Rene Engelhard wrote:
>>OOo already works with GCC's STL (there are a few namespace-shuffling
>>patches needed, but they're already in the upstream tree). The only reason
>
>
> Sure it will work? See
> http://lists.ximian.com/pipermail/openoffice/2005-August/001090.html (and
> the referenced
> http://lists.ximian.com/pipermail/openoffice/2005-August/001090.html)
Yeah, it doesn't work yet.
*sigh*
The STLport dependency is still pretty annoying, but I guess we're stuck
with it for a while longer.
Reply to: