Re: are you planning to release openoffice.org_1.1.3-2 soon?
Hi,
Am Donnerstag, 18. November 2004 15:04 schrieben Sie:
> According to
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-openoffice/2004/11/msg00136.html these
> problems will be solved in openoffice.org_1.1.3-2.
>
> So are you planing to release the new version in 15 hours?
I plan to release it at the same time as 1.1.2dfsg1-3 is released. Not sure
when that is-
> If not, maybe you can suggest me what is better to do - to compile
> openoffice.org_1.1.3-1 with lt-fixes.diff or compile the latest (CVS)
> version of upcoming openoffice.org_1.1.3-2?
The latest CVS of OPENOFFICE_ORG_1_1_3 contains a file conflict (between
openoffice.org and openoffice.org-l10n-en) and probably won't have the needed
maintainer scripts for ttf-opensymbol. I'll need to merge the changed planned
for 1.1.2dfsg1-3 to it...
I'd go with 1.1.3-1 with lt-fixes, but don't forget that word-count.diff
changed, too.
> I know only one way to compile openoffice.org - first I'm doing
> "apt-get source openoffice.org" and then "dpkg-buildpackage -us -uc"
>
> How I should compile CVS version ? Could you give me short instructions
> what to do instead of "apt-get source openoffice.org" to get the latest
> upcoming openoffice.org_1.1.3-2 ?
1.) wget
http://ftp.debian.org/debian/pool/main/o/openoffice.org/openoffice.org_1.1.3.orig.tar.gz
2.) tar xfvz openoffice.org_1.1.3.orig.tar.gz
3.) cd openoffice.org-1.1.3.orig.tar.gz
4.) cvs -d :pserver:anonymous@cvs.debian.org:/cvs/debian-openoffice co -d
debian oo-deb/debian
5.) debian/rules get-ooo-build
6.) debian/rules get-ooo-icons
7.) debian/rules get-libwpd
8.) dpkg-buildpackage -b -us -uc (-b because you don't need the time-consuming
sourcepkg generation)
Note that the _important_ 1.1.2dfsg1-3 changes are *NOT* yet merged...
Regards,
Rene
--
.''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer
: :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/
`. `' rene@debian.org | GnuPG-Key ID: 248AEB73
`- Fingerprint: 41FA F208 28D4 7CA5 19BB 7AD9 F859 90B0 248A EB73
Reply to: