Hi,
Martin Kretzschmar wrote:
> > Dan Korostelev wrote:
> > > > A license specific to Debian is not allowed.
> > > I'll ask him about OOO icons license. I guess it's LGPL, but I dunno
> > > exactly.
>
> 1) Most of the icons you want are already in ooo-build/desktop, i.e. almost
> trivially available to the packageing scripts. They just have to be renamed.
oh :)
And converted to png probably...
> 2) Most of Jimmac's icons were painted for Ximian/Novell, so licenses won't
> be a problem I guess, but anyway, asking him is the best way.
Well, if they already are in ooo-icons I don't see a problem either but
yes, asking him doesn't hurt ;)
> > > despite icons license, can you at least make ooo .desktop icons
> > themeable by
> > > applying 'sed' magic, you mentioned (removing absolute paths)??
> >
> > yes. done in CVS. Will be in 1.1.2-2.
>
> A comment from a backseat coder (i.e. from me; when will cvs move to
> alioth?): it looks a bit strange that debian/rules first insert the path,
Good question...
> then strip it again ;-)
We do? Oops :)
Grüße/Regards,
René
--
.''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer
: :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/
`. `' rene@debian.org | GnuPG-Key ID: 248AEB73
`- Fingerprint: 41FA F208 28D4 7CA5 19BB 7AD9 F859 90B0 248A EB73
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature