[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Building the packages for Woody (1.0.1-6)



Hi Jerome,

Thanks for your reports

On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 11:34:00PM +0100, Jerome Warnier wrote:
> >> Done all this, but I still end up with different problems:
> >>
> >> The first one is a "permission denied" on excvpe for java_detect.sh.
> >
> > How is this, I still have this problem. It is just this script not being
> > executable, I fixed it by hand (chmod +x) after interrupting the build
> > process.

Fixed in debian/rules CVS now.

> >> Setting up the environment for building OpenOffice.
> >> Setting platform independent values... done
> >> Setting Linux Intel specific values... done
> >> NO_GXX_INCLUDE = no_gxx_include, NO_GXX_INCLUDE = argv(2)
> >> Please enter the g++ include path (e.g. /usr/include/g++-3):
> >>
> >> On my system, I happen to have a /usr/include/g++-3 and a
> >> /usr/include/g++-v3 directories.
> >> Which one should I choose?
> >> Why isn't that automated?
> >
> >
> > I still have this problem too. Where does it come from?
> > Is it Woody-related?

Yes, it was due to a patch that changed the include search path for 3.0.
I've modified the needed patch for gcc-3.0 to include that one now.

> > Is it possible to build in parallel now? Is there still problems with
> > the build process? It would go *really* faster in my case, because I
> > could use a lot of machines in // (maybe 20!).

No, please see:

http://www.openoffice.org/issues/showdependencytree.cgi?id=9443

> One more problem, not related to previous ones.
> It seems the build process is looking anyway to g++ and not to g++-3.0.
> On Woody, it seems the package g++-3.0 doesn't provide a /usr/bin/g++.
> If g++-2.95 is not installed on your machine OOo doesn't build.
> 
> make[1]: Entering directory
> `/tmp/openoffice.org-1.0.1/build-tree/oo_1.0.1_src/stlport/unxlngi4.pro/misc/build/STLport-4.5.3/src'
> g++ --fexceptions -shared -o ../lib/libstlport_gcc.so.4.5

Yes that's right - Gerard reported this on this list a few days ago and Jan checked in a patch.

I've completed the backport - I'll announce in a new thread.

Thanks,
Chris

Attachment: pgp3A_AgVsyoq.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: