[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: oo vs gcc 3.2



Hi Jack . 

On Mon, Sep 02, 2002 at 12:41:36AM -0400, Jack Howarth wrote:
>Jan,
>   Speaking of mirroring, what is the status of the gcc 3.2 rebuilds
>of OpenOffice.org 1.0.1? I am rather confused by the state of things
>as seen from...
>
>http://ftp.freenet.de/pub/ftp.vpn-junkies.de/openoffice/pool/main/stlport/
>http://ftp.freenet.de/pub/ftp.vpn-junkies.de/openoffice/pool/contrib/openoffice.org/

First .. we are proud to build OOo in unstable with one gcc compiler..
we are using gcc-3.2.

For Woody, I will see to build OOo with gcc-3.0 on intel and gcc-2.95 on
PPC ... if that do not work, I have to build gcc-3.2/glibc-2.2.13 and
higher etc etc for woody .. 

We will see!

>I see an openoffice.org 1.0.1-5 dsc which claims to Build-Depends g++-3.2
>yet I don't see a libstlport4.5gcc3.2(-dev) clearly built on gcc 3.2!
>So while we have powerpc packages for openoffice.org 1.0.1-5 that by
>their control file must have been built with gcc 3.2 we don't seem 
>to have gcc 3.2 libstlport4.5 packages built with gcc 3.2. Is that
>kosher considering that the c++ abi changed between gcc 3.1 and 3.2?

I think, the abi changes are not too much from gcc-3.1.x to gcc-3.2
*phew*, but we have to rebuild libstlport with gcc-3.2 for OOo.

I will upload it today, so Chris can create the packages.gz ... 

	Thnx for your mail!

		Regards
			Jan
-- 
  .''`.    Jan-Hendrik Palic     |
 : :' : ** Debian GNU/ Linux **  |   ** OpenOffice.org **       ,.. ,..
 `. `'   http://www.debian.org   | http://www.openoffice.org  ,: ..`   `
   `-  jan.palic@linux-debian.de |                           '  `  `

Attachment: pgp5Ye4aGV_Zy.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: