Re: Apologizes and progress
- To: debian-openoffice@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Apologizes and progress
- From: Peter Novodvorsky <nidd@altlinux.ru>
- Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2002 02:35:06 +0300
- Message-id: <[🔎] 20020206023506.A28263@linux.ru.net>
- In-reply-to: <20020131204600.A22966@pcpool00.mathematik.uni-freiburg.de>; from brl@pcpool00.mathematik.uni-freiburg.de on Thu, Jan 31, 2002 at 08:46:00PM +0100
- References: <7xofjag70i.fsf@cs.msu.su> <20020131204600.A22966@pcpool00.mathematik.uni-freiburg.de>
++ 31/01/02 20:46 +0100 - Bernhard R. Link:
> I think the next would be some packages I thought of naming
> udk-tools-cvs, oo-api-cvs and oo-ucb-cvs.
>
> Candidates for the first are cpputools rdbmaker and unotools. (First
> two are already autoconfed)
Great! can you make CVS of this sources or just put them somewhere?
>
> Like udkapi contains the idl's for the udk, offapi and drafts contain
> those for the rest. Drafts is for those not stabiliesed, but I do not
> thing seperating them helps very much, as there are only one or two
> modules only needing udkapi and not drafts.
> An problem here is the generation of the header files. cppumaker seem
> to have no modus to make only the headers for offapi and drafts but not
> those of the udk again. (It only has a switch for not overwriting
> existing files, but this is not option when making an new package).
>
> When I have time I will look into this. Either deleting the already
> existing files or changing cppumaker.
I'll try too solve this.
Nidd.
Reply to: