Hi... On Thu, Aug 23, 2001 at 08:16:03PM +0200, Bernhard R. Link wrote: >I wanted to ask, who has succesfully compiles the openoffice.org sources on an >Debian system and which Version of Debian, Openoffice and which compiler was used. I'm affraid to see, that nobody wa able to compile it on debian. I was confused while running ./bootstrap for OpenOffice 633. There was one include, whis fails very often. As I mentioned it in my other mail before was the only thing, that the path of the include was wrong. For Example: in oo_src633/tools/bootstrp/cprjexe.cxx you find this: ... #ifdef BOOTSTRAPPER #include <glibc/posix/getopt.h> #else #include <glibc/getopt.h> #endif #endif #ifdef UNX #ifdef BOOTSTRAPPER #ifndef SOLARIS #include <glibc/posix/getopt.h> #endif #ifdef MACOSX #include <glibc/posix/getopt.h> #endif #else #include <glibc/config.h> #ifndef SOLARIS #include <glibc/getopt.h> #endif #endif #endif ... Hmmm... but the compiling failed and I asked me, if on other Linux's this path here matches or not. I don't have a directory /usr/include/glibc, see... : palic@billgotchy:~/OpenOffice/oo_633_src$ ls /usr/include/gl* /usr/include/glob.h Does anyone explain, why thay do things like this, why do they include glibc/posix/getopt.h and not getopt.h? >Jan-Hendrik 'Gromitt' Palic and I have currently taken two different approches. > >While Jan goes top-bottom and tries to compile the source with the given tools, >I'm trying to get the odk, the underlying object broker with it tools compiled >using standard tools like autoconf, which should allow an more easy nad packageable >way to build Openoffice. I wanted to package the tar.gz, you mailed me... I will do it next week, surely :) and make them downloadable :) >Using g++ 2.xx Compilers we both seem to end with an broken idlc. (This is the >"compiler" which translates .idl files, which specify interfaces over which the >objects in different langagues can communicate, to something an c++-compiler can >use). It's horrorble. I have installed all build essentials and I had to see, that nothing will work! >We both end up with an binary that throws segmentation faults. In my case I can >reduce it to some not-called constructors, which seem like an failure of g++ or >some incompatibility between OO.o and g++. You tried with gcc/g++ 2.95? I will tri the OpenOffice 638 with gcc/g++ 3.0. We'll see! Greetings Jan -- One time, you all will be emulated by linux! ---- Jan- Hendrik Palic Url:"http://www.billgotchy.de"; E-Mail: "palic@billgotchy.de" -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK----- Version: 3.12 GCS d- s: a-- C++ UL++ P+++ L+++ E W++ N+ o+ K- w--- O- M- V- PS++ PE Y+ PGP++ t--- 5- X+++ R-- tv- b++ DI-- D+++ G+++ e+++ h+ r++ z+ ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
Attachment:
pgpcE2viMbJ0b.pgp
Description: PGP signature