Le vendredi 01 janvier 2021 à 23:08 +0100, Rafael Laboissière a écrit : > * Sébastien Villemot <sebastien@debian.org> [2021-01-01 22:47]: > > Le vendredi 01 janvier 2021 à 22:13 +0100, Rafael Laboissière a écrit : > > > > > I uploaded version 6.1.1~hg.2020.12.27 to experimental and checked all > > > the packages that build-depend on octave or dh-octave. They all build > > > fine against the new version of the octave package, besides > > > psychtoolbox-3, which has some issues. However, I just realized that > > > this package has never been built against octave 6. I will investigate > > > this later. > > > Since the bullseye freeze deadline is approaching, we should make a > > > plan regarding the uploading of this new version to unstable, as well > > > as those for the remaining packages which are stuck (stk, interval, > > > level-set and vibes). > > > > Thanks for your work. > > > > In my opinion, the latest version of octave could directly be uploaded > > to unstable. The risk of breakage is minimal, since we’re following the > > stable branch of octave. > > > > There are at least two additional changes that I would like to make > > before the bullseye release: > > > > - reinstate the build dependency on sundials, since the latter has > > migrated back to testing, and octave 6 should normally be compatible > > with sundials 4 > > > > - fix upstream bug #59704, which badly impacts Dynare.¹ There is a > > candidate patch, but it still needs review by other octave devs. > > > > I will probably make those changes once the latest version of octave > > migrates to testing. > > What do you mean by “latest version”? The one that I uploaded to > experimental? Yes indeed. -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ Sébastien Villemot ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Debian Developer ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ https://sebastien.villemot.name ⠈⠳⣄⠀⠀⠀⠀ https://www.debian.org
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part