Terrific! Thank a lot for your support and patience! Do I need to do anything regarding the RFS and ITP bugs associated with these finished packages? the list of those that have both ITP and RFS can be found at https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?submitter=fangqq%40gmail.com Moving forward, I have 3 more packages to finish – all of them are Monte Carlo photon simulators (one of those – mcx – is CUDA based, and two others – mmc/mcxcl – are OpenCL based, each of them has an Octave mex-based toolbox). I am currently working on new upstream releases before making the packages. I have two general questions
Thanks again Qianqian From: Rafael Laboissière * Qianqian Fang <fangqq@gmail.com> [2020-07-01 16:13]: > On 7/1/20 8:35 AM, Rafael Laboissière wrote: >> I think so. If something goes weird, we can recreate the Git repository. > > done. see > > https://salsa.debian.org/pkg-octave-team/octave-iso2mesh Looks good now. > I added a symbolic link to tetgen because iso2mesh functions accepts > both 'tetgen' and 'tetgen1.5'. > > https://salsa.debian.org/pkg-octave-team/octave-iso2mesh/-/commit/50a2b5e3077fcaf1368b2206fb734a1cb846c49b > > I am now getting a single warning > > *W: iso2mesh-tools: binary-without-manpage usr/bin/tetgen1.5* > > let me know if this can be ignored or also need to create a link to > tetgen's manual? > > also let me know if you see anything else that should be fixed. I fixed this issue in commit 9d1c8eb. I also fixed the Arch:all problem, in commit 0f715af. I think that all new packages are ready now for the initial release. I will upload them to unstable soon. They will go into the NEW queue, of course. Thanks for these contributions to the DOG. Best, Rafael |