Le mardi 08 octobre 2019 à 16:30 +0200, Sébastien Villemot a écrit : > Le mardi 08 octobre 2019 à 16:06 +0200, Rafael Laboissière a écrit : > > * Sébastien Villemot < > > sebastien@debian.org > > > [2019-10-08 15:51]: > > > > > Le mardi 08 octobre 2019 à 15:25 +0200, Rafael Laboissière a écrit : > > > > For now, only four package have compilation issues against Octave 5: > > > > biosig4c++, octave-ocs, vlfeat, and octave-mpi. The first three are only > > > > in sid, so that the only package that is blocking the release is > > > > octave-mpi. I would suggest that we ask the removal of octave-mpi from > > > > testing, such that the transition can be completed. > > > > > > > > If nobody objects, I will file the bug report asking for the removal. > > > > > > Actually no need to file a bug. I already asked for the removal in the > > > transition bug (#934630). > > > > Great, thanks ! > > > > Should we add User and Usertags pseudo-headers, as recommended [*]? > > I don’t think so, because this is a transition bug, not a removal bug. Actually, we probably have one more task to handle for the transition to occur. Two packages (octave-tsa and octave-splines) now fail their autopkgtests (as shown on https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/octave). I think this needs to be fixed before everything can migrate to testing. -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ Sébastien Villemot ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Debian Developer ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ http://sebastien.villemot.name ⠈⠳⣄⠀⠀⠀⠀ http://www.debian.org
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part